[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAtXAHdYhWP==Vtt+i_0xOmSzZNmbJJuY470XLUxBSxmZ12BYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:13:21 -0800
From: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
To: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks
Hi Alan,
a couple of nits below.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com> wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * Send overlay callbacks to handlers that match. This call is blocking. In
Can we make this 'Invoke' instead of send?
> @@ -370,6 +448,13 @@ int of_overlay_create(struct device_node *tree)
> goto err_free_idr;
> }
>
> + err = send_overlay_callbacks(ov, OF_OVERLAY_PRE_APPLY);
Again ... maybe invoke ;-)
> + if (err < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: Pre apply handler failed (err=%d)\n",
> + __func__, err);
> + goto err_free_idr;
> + }
> +
> /* apply the overlay */
> err = of_overlay_apply(ov);
> if (err) {
> @@ -389,6 +474,8 @@ int of_overlay_create(struct device_node *tree)
> /* add to the tail of the overlay list */
> list_add_tail(&ov->node, &ov_list);
>
> + send_overlay_callbacks(ov, OF_OVERLAY_POST_APPLY);
And again :)
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index dc6e396..def9481 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -101,9 +101,33 @@ static inline int of_node_is_attached(struct device_node *node)
> return node && node->kobj.state_in_sysfs;
> }
>
> +/* Callback types */
> +#define OF_OVERLAY_PRE_APPLY (0)
> +#define OF_OVERLAY_POST_APPLY (1)
> +#define OF_OVERLAY_PRE_REMOVE (2)
> +#define OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE (3)
Can we make this an enum?
Cheers,
Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists