lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:20:28 +0100 From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> To: "Sudip Mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> Cc: "Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] portman2x4 - use new parport device model On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:56:27 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Modify portman driver to use the new parallel port device model. > The advantage of using the device model is that the device gets binded > to the hardware, we get the feature of hotplug, we can bind/unbind > the driver at runtime. > The changes are in the way the driver gets registered with the > parallel port subsystem and the temporary device to probe portman card > is removed and portman_probe() is used in the probe callback. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org> > --- > > v5: claimed flag and one call to parport_claim() removed. > v4: temporary device to probe is removed. > v3: changed commit message > v2: > 1. pardev_cb is initialized while declaring, thus removing the use of > memset. > 2. used pdev->id. > 3. v1 did not have the parport probe callback, but we will need the > probe callback for binding as the name of the driver and the name of > the device is different. > 4. in v1 I missed modifying snd_portman_probe_port(). OK, I merged this one to for-next branch now. Let's cross fingers :) thanks, Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists