linux-kernel - Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160218143431.2e0a9150@lappi3.vsora>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:34:31 +0100
From:	Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher@...teo.de>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:44:34 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com> wrote:
> > > It is workable, but I guess nested tables produced a better
> > > result.
> > > 
> > > I did myself a test with nested tables with asciidoc too:
> > > 
> > > https://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/media-kabi-docs-test/pandoc_asciidoc/table.html
> > > https://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/media-kabi-docs-test/pandoc_asciidoc/table.ascii
> > > 
> > > With looks very decent to me.    
> > 
> > It does, except for the vertical alignment of the third column (at
> > least when viewed with google chrome).  
> 
> Not sure what you mean. Here, it looks fine on both Firefox and
> Chrome, except that the second colum size could be smaller. If this
> is what you're meaning this can be fixed by changing the second line
> from:

I think Hans' problem (I see it as well) is coming from css-style of
"paragraph" which is:

    margin-top: 0.5em;
    margin-bottom: 0.5em;

This makes the third column non-vertical-aligned

--
Patrick