[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C603E9.9050307@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:48:25 -0800
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: samsung: fix the inconsistency in spinlock
Hi Anand,
On 02/18/2016 09:40 AM, Anand Moon wrote:
> From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>
> changes fix the correct order of the spin_lock_irqrestore/save.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> index d72cd73..96fe14d 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> @@ -759,9 +759,9 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars(int irq, void *id)
> }
>
> if (uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit) < WAKEUP_CHARS) {
> - spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> uart_write_wakeup(port);
> - spin_lock(&port->lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
This driver shouldn't be dropping the spin lock at for write wakeup.
If this is causing lock-ups in a line discipline, the line discipline
needs fixed.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> }
>
> if (uart_circ_empty(xmit))
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists