[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160215200211.GB17690@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:53:26 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Cody P Schafer <dev@...yps.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Jérémie Galarneau
<jeremie.galarneau@...icios.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, pi3orama@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/54] perf tools: Add API to config maps in bpf object
Sorry for the top post, but the message below didn't made it thru due to
local problems as I recently switched notebooks, my postfix setup barfed
this one :-\
This is what I have in my tmp.perf/bpf_map:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=tmp.perf/bpf_map&id=5c78fe3c5a944ba7f9a85f59548295211f3d252c
Please take a look and see if you're ok with it,
I'm going thru the other patches in this week's patchkit, thanks
for keeping up with this work,
Regards,
- Arnaldo
Em Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 02:01:31PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> bpf__config_obj() is introduced as a core API to config BPF object
> after loading. One configuration option of maps is introduced. After
> this patch BPF object can accept configuration like:
>
> maps:my_map.value=1234
Ok, tested this, works great, trace_printk gets what I pass via the
event definition, etc.
One suggestion, tho. I think "maps", plural, is strange, we're referring
to one map, not multiple ones when we write: "map:my_map.value=1234", so
I have this on a separate branch, tmp.perf/bpf_map, do you agree?
Shorter, one character less to type :-)
I also changed some error reports and the commit log, hope that improved
it, please also take a look.
I'm now working on the patch right after this, all will be on the
tmp.perf/bpf_map shortly.
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
index e24d5b7a9fec..fdb23c785ced 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
@@ -921,8 +921,8 @@ bpf__obj_config_map(struct bpf_object *obj,
struct perf_evlist *evlist,
int *key_scan_pos)
{
- /* key is "maps:<mapname>.<config opt>" */
- char *map_name = strdup(term->config + sizeof("maps:") - 1);
+ /* key is "map:<mapname>.<config opt>" */
+ char *map_name = strdup(term->config + sizeof("map:") - 1);
struct bpf_map *map;
int err = -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__OBJCONF_OPT;
char *map_opt;
@@ -961,8 +961,7 @@ bpf__obj_config_map(struct bpf_object *obj,
}
}
- pr_debug("ERROR: Invalid config option '%s' for maps\n",
- map_opt);
+ pr_debug("ERROR: Invalid map config option '%s'\n", map_opt);
err = -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__OBJCONF_MAP_OPT;
out:
free(map_name);
@@ -982,8 +981,8 @@ int bpf__config_obj(struct bpf_object *obj,
if (!obj || !term || !term->config)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!prefixcmp(term->config, "maps:")) {
- key_scan_pos = sizeof("maps:") - 1;
+ if (!prefixcmp(term->config, "map:")) {
+ key_scan_pos = sizeof("map:") - 1;
err = bpf__obj_config_map(obj, term, evlist, &key_scan_pos);
goto out;
}
@@ -1011,7 +1010,7 @@ static const char *bpf_loader_strerror_table[NR_ERRNO] = {
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUEOOB)] = "Offset out of bound for prologue",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_OPT)] = "Invalid object config option",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_CONF)] = "Config value not set (missing '=')",
- [ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_MAP_OPT)] = "Invalid object maps config option",
+ [ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_MAP_OPT)] = "Invalid object map config option",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_MAP_NOTEXIST)] = "Target map doesn't exist",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_MAP_VALUE)] = "Incorrect value type for map",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(OBJCONF_MAP_TYPE)] = "Incorrect map type",
----- End forwarded message -----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists