lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2016 22:29:46 +0900
From:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@...il.com>
To:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc:	g.liakhovetski@....de, mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp,
	fabio.estevam@...escale.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine


Hi Robert,

At Sat, 06 Feb 2016 10:05:51 +0100,
Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> 
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
> > From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> > Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:44:56 +0100
> >
> >> Apart from Alberto who answered he cannot test it by lack of hardware, the
> >> others didn't answer.
> >> 
> >> So how can I move forward ? Would you want me to amend the KConfig to add a "&&
> >> !ARCH_PXA" on the "depend" line ?
> >
> > Please just keep pinging people to properly test this.
> Okay, let's have another try.
> 
> Hi Guennadi, Hitoshi, Fabio,
> 
> Could any of you try this patch to ensure your board is not broken please ?
> I've re-added the patch at the end of this mail for easier handling. Normally no
> code path in non-PXA board is changed, so the test should be straightforward.
> 
> It's also available in : https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/30/768
> 
> You're the maintainers of the following boards using smc911x AFAIK:
>  - sh2007: Guennadi and Hitoshi

(I noticed my previous mail was bounced, so sending it again)

Really sorry, currently I don't have the board :(
Do you have a working board that can be used for testing, Guennadi?

Thanks,
Hitoshi

>  - armadillo5x0: Alberto
>  - imx v6 and imx v7: Fabio
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> -- 
> Robert
> 
> 
> ---8<---
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Subject: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine
> To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:40:28 +0100 (9 weeks, 4 days, 11 hours ago)
> Message-Id: <1448919628-13273-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4
> 
> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine
> slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic.
> 
> The driver was only compile tested. The risk is quite small as no
> current PXA platform I'm aware of is using smc911x driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.h | 63 ++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c
> index bd64eb982e52..3f5711061432 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ static const char version[] =
>  #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  
> +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> +#include <linux/dma/pxa-dma.h>
> +
>  #include <asm/io.h>
>  
>  #include "smc911x.h"
> @@ -1174,18 +1177,16 @@ static irqreturn_t smc911x_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
>  static void
> -smc911x_tx_dma_irq(int dma, void *data)
> +smc911x_tx_dma_irq(void *data)
>  {
> -	struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
> -	struct smc911x_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct smc911x_local *lp = data;
> +	struct net_device *dev = lp->netdev;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb = lp->current_tx_skb;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	DBG(SMC_DEBUG_FUNC, dev, "--> %s\n", __func__);
>  
>  	DBG(SMC_DEBUG_TX | SMC_DEBUG_DMA, dev, "TX DMA irq handler\n");
> -	/* Clear the DMA interrupt sources */
> -	SMC_DMA_ACK_IRQ(dev, dma);
>  	BUG_ON(skb == NULL);
>  	dma_unmap_single(NULL, tx_dmabuf, tx_dmalen, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  	dev->trans_start = jiffies;
> @@ -1208,18 +1209,16 @@ smc911x_tx_dma_irq(int dma, void *data)
>  	    "TX DMA irq completed\n");
>  }
>  static void
> -smc911x_rx_dma_irq(int dma, void *data)
> +smc911x_rx_dma_irq(void *data)
>  {
> -	struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
> -	struct smc911x_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct smc911x_local *lp = data;
> +	struct net_device *dev = lp->netdev;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb = lp->current_rx_skb;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	unsigned int pkts;
>  
>  	DBG(SMC_DEBUG_FUNC, dev, "--> %s\n", __func__);
>  	DBG(SMC_DEBUG_RX | SMC_DEBUG_DMA, dev, "RX DMA irq handler\n");
> -	/* Clear the DMA interrupt sources */
> -	SMC_DMA_ACK_IRQ(dev, dma);
>  	dma_unmap_single(NULL, rx_dmabuf, rx_dmalen, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  	BUG_ON(skb == NULL);
>  	lp->current_rx_skb = NULL;
> @@ -1792,6 +1791,9 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>  	unsigned int val, chip_id, revision;
>  	const char *version_string;
>  	unsigned long irq_flags;
> +	struct dma_slave_config	config;
> +	dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> +	struct pxad_param param;
>  
>  	DBG(SMC_DEBUG_FUNC, dev, "--> %s\n", __func__);
>  
> @@ -1963,11 +1965,40 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>  		goto err_out;
>  
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
> -	lp->rxdma = SMC_DMA_REQUEST(dev, smc911x_rx_dma_irq);
> -	lp->txdma = SMC_DMA_REQUEST(dev, smc911x_tx_dma_irq);
> +
> +	dma_cap_zero(mask);
> +	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
> +	param.prio = PXAD_PRIO_LOWEST;
> +	param.drcmr = -1UL;
> +
> +	lp->rxdma =
> +		dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, pxad_filter_fn,
> +						 &param, &dev->dev, "rx");
> +	lp->txdma =
> +		dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, pxad_filter_fn,
> +						 &param, &dev->dev, "tx");
>  	lp->rxdma_active = 0;
>  	lp->txdma_active = 0;
> -	dev->dma = lp->rxdma;
> +
> +	memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config));
> +	config.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
> +	config.dst_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
> +	config.src_addr = lp->physaddr + RX_DATA_FIFO;
> +	config.dst_addr = lp->physaddr + TX_DATA_FIFO;
> +	config.src_maxburst = 32;
> +	config.dst_maxburst = 32;
> +	retval = dmaengine_slave_config(lp->rxdma, &config);
> +	if (retval) {
> +		dev_err(lp->dev, "dma rx channel configuration failed: %d\n",
> +			retval);
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
> +	retval = dmaengine_slave_config(lp->txdma, &config);
> +	if (retval) {
> +		dev_err(lp->dev, "dma tx channel configuration failed: %d\n",
> +			retval);
> +		goto err_out;
> +	}
>  #endif
>  
>  	retval = register_netdev(dev);
> @@ -1978,11 +2009,11 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>  			    dev->base_addr, dev->irq);
>  
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
> -		if (lp->rxdma != -1)
> -			pr_cont(" RXDMA %d", lp->rxdma);
> +		if (lp->rxdma)
> +			pr_cont(" RXDMA %p", lp->rxdma);
>  
> -		if (lp->txdma != -1)
> -			pr_cont(" TXDMA %d", lp->txdma);
> +		if (lp->txdma)
> +			pr_cont(" TXDMA %p", lp->txdma);
>  #endif
>  		pr_cont("\n");
>  		if (!is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr)) {
> @@ -2005,12 +2036,10 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>  err_out:
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
>  	if (retval) {
> -		if (lp->rxdma != -1) {
> -			SMC_DMA_FREE(dev, lp->rxdma);
> -		}
> -		if (lp->txdma != -1) {
> -			SMC_DMA_FREE(dev, lp->txdma);
> -		}
> +		if (lp->rxdma)
> +			dma_release_channel(lp->rxdma);
> +		if (lp->txdma)
> +			dma_release_channel(lp->txdma);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  	return retval;
> @@ -2112,12 +2141,10 @@ static int smc911x_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
>  	{
> -		if (lp->rxdma != -1) {
> -			SMC_DMA_FREE(dev, lp->rxdma);
> -		}
> -		if (lp->txdma != -1) {
> -			SMC_DMA_FREE(dev, lp->txdma);
> -		}
> +		if (lp->rxdma)
> +			dma_release_channel(lp->rxdma);
> +		if (lp->txdma)
> +			dma_release_channel(lp->txdma);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  	iounmap(lp->base);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.h
> index 04b35f55df97..fa528ea0ea51 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.h
> @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ struct smc911x_local {
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
>  	/* DMA needs the physical address of the chip */
>  	u_long physaddr;
> -	int rxdma;
> -	int txdma;
> +	struct dma_chan *rxdma;
> +	struct dma_chan *txdma;
>  	int rxdma_active;
>  	int txdma_active;
>  	struct sk_buff *current_rx_skb;
> @@ -210,27 +210,6 @@ static inline void SMC_outsl(struct smc911x_local *lp, int reg,
>  
>  #ifdef SMC_USE_PXA_DMA
>  
> -#include <mach/dma.h>
> -
> -/*
> - * Define the request and free functions
> - * These are unfortunately architecture specific as no generic allocation
> - * mechanism exits
> - */
> -#define SMC_DMA_REQUEST(dev, handler) \
> -	 pxa_request_dma(dev->name, DMA_PRIO_LOW, handler, dev)
> -
> -#define SMC_DMA_FREE(dev, dma) \
> -	 pxa_free_dma(dma)
> -
> -#define SMC_DMA_ACK_IRQ(dev, dma)					\
> -{									\
> -	if (DCSR(dma) & DCSR_BUSERR) {					\
> -		netdev_err(dev, "DMA %d bus error!\n", dma);		\
> -	}								\
> -	DCSR(dma) = DCSR_STARTINTR|DCSR_ENDINTR|DCSR_BUSERR;		\
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Use a DMA for RX and TX packets.
>   */
> @@ -238,6 +217,8 @@ static inline void SMC_outsl(struct smc911x_local *lp, int reg,
>  
>  static dma_addr_t rx_dmabuf, tx_dmabuf;
>  static int rx_dmalen, tx_dmalen;
> +static void smc911x_rx_dma_irq(void *data);
> +static void smc911x_tx_dma_irq(void *data);
>  
>  #ifdef SMC_insl
>  #undef SMC_insl
> @@ -246,8 +227,10 @@ static int rx_dmalen, tx_dmalen;
>  
>  static inline void
>  smc_pxa_dma_insl(struct smc911x_local *lp, u_long physaddr,
> -		int reg, int dma, u_char *buf, int len)
> +		int reg, struct dma_chan *dma, u_char *buf, int len)
>  {
> +	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx;
> +
>  	/* 64 bit alignment is required for memory to memory DMA */
>  	if ((long)buf & 4) {
>  		*((u32 *)buf) = SMC_inl(lp, reg);
> @@ -258,12 +241,14 @@ smc_pxa_dma_insl(struct smc911x_local *lp, u_long physaddr,
>  	len *= 4;
>  	rx_dmabuf = dma_map_single(lp->dev, buf, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  	rx_dmalen = len;
> -	DCSR(dma) = DCSR_NODESC;
> -	DTADR(dma) = rx_dmabuf;
> -	DSADR(dma) = physaddr + reg;
> -	DCMD(dma) = (DCMD_INCTRGADDR | DCMD_BURST32 |
> -		DCMD_WIDTH4 | DCMD_ENDIRQEN | (DCMD_LENGTH & rx_dmalen));
> -	DCSR(dma) = DCSR_NODESC | DCSR_RUN;
> +	tx = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dma, rx_dmabuf, rx_dmalen,
> +					 DMA_DEV_TO_MEM, 0);
> +	if (tx) {
> +		tx->callback = smc911x_rx_dma_irq;
> +		tx->callback_param = lp;
> +		dmaengine_submit(tx);
> +		dma_async_issue_pending(dma);
> +	}
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -274,8 +259,10 @@ smc_pxa_dma_insl(struct smc911x_local *lp, u_long physaddr,
>  
>  static inline void
>  smc_pxa_dma_outsl(struct smc911x_local *lp, u_long physaddr,
> -		int reg, int dma, u_char *buf, int len)
> +		int reg, struct dma_chan *dma, u_char *buf, int len)
>  {
> +	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx;
> +
>  	/* 64 bit alignment is required for memory to memory DMA */
>  	if ((long)buf & 4) {
>  		SMC_outl(*((u32 *)buf), lp, reg);
> @@ -286,12 +273,14 @@ smc_pxa_dma_outsl(struct smc911x_local *lp, u_long physaddr,
>  	len *= 4;
>  	tx_dmabuf = dma_map_single(lp->dev, buf, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  	tx_dmalen = len;
> -	DCSR(dma) = DCSR_NODESC;
> -	DSADR(dma) = tx_dmabuf;
> -	DTADR(dma) = physaddr + reg;
> -	DCMD(dma) = (DCMD_INCSRCADDR | DCMD_BURST32 |
> -		DCMD_WIDTH4 | DCMD_ENDIRQEN | (DCMD_LENGTH & tx_dmalen));
> -	DCSR(dma) = DCSR_NODESC | DCSR_RUN;
> +	tx = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dma, tx_dmabuf, tx_dmalen,
> +					 DMA_DEV_TO_MEM, 0);
> +	if (tx) {
> +		tx->callback = smc911x_tx_dma_irq;
> +		tx->callback_param = lp;
> +		dmaengine_submit(tx);
> +		dma_async_issue_pending(dma);
> +	}
>  }
>  #endif
>  #endif	 /* SMC_USE_PXA_DMA */
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ