[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgTyfkcMLkH=ehLWZ5hv2LYi6q4cXVsJS7y5Pf0oXZMtyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:06:50 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] serial: samsung: drop the spinlock around uart_write_wakeup
Hi Peter,
On 20 February 2016 at 01:00, Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> [ +cc Krzysztof Kozlowski ]
>
> On 02/18/2016 09:15 PM, Anand Moon wrote:
>> From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>>
>> drop the spin_unlock/lock around uart_write_wakeup to protect
>> write wakeup for uart port.
>
> What Krzysztof was saying wrt v1 of this patch is that the
> changelog should provide as much information as possible to
> the maintainer(s) and driver author(s), and that you should
> test that outcome.
>
> Here's what I would have written for a commit message:
>
>
> Remove deadlock workaround for line disciplines that invoke
> the tty driver's write() method directly from their write_wakeup()
> method. As documented for the write_wakeup() line discipline method
> in tty_ldisc.h, line disciplines must not attempt i/o directly
> from write_wakeup() as this will deadlock. Reviews of in-tree line
> disciplines confirm all defer i/o.
>
> NB: This workaround was added in commit c15c3747ee32
> ("serial: samsung: fix potential soft lockup during uart write")
> which notes both slip and bluetooth hci attempt i/o directly from
> write_wakeup(). These issues were fixed in commits 661f7fda21b1
> ("slip: Fix deadlock in write_wakeup") and da64c27d3c93
> ("bluetooth: hci_ldisc: fix deadlock condition"), respectively.
>
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
>
>
> PS - Minor procedural note: please cc those who have reviewed previous
> patch versions when you submit new versions, ok? Not a big deal,
> lots of submitters don't, but it's still preferred.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>> ---
>> changes logs: drop the previous approch of spin_unlock_irqrestore/save
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> index d72cd73..0cb70a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> @@ -758,11 +758,8 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars(int irq, void *id)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if (uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit) < WAKEUP_CHARS) {
>> - spin_unlock(&port->lock);
>> + if (uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
>> uart_write_wakeup(port);
>> - spin_lock(&port->lock);
>> - }
>>
>> if (uart_circ_empty(xmit))
>> s3c24xx_serial_stop_tx(port);
>>
>
Thanks I will append your suggestions and resend this patch.
I will keep a note of your suggestions thanks you.
Best Regards.
-Anand Moon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists