[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C80FC3.8050205@microchip.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:33:31 +0530
From: Purna Chandra Mandal <purna.mandal@...rochip.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Joshua Henderson <joshua.henderson@...rochip.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: clk-pic32: Add PIC32 clock driver
On 02/20/2016 01:46 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Joshua Henderson (2016-02-19 08:25:35)
>> +const struct clk_ops pic32_roclk_ops = {
>> + .enable = roclk_enable,
>> + .disable = roclk_disable,
>> + .is_enabled = roclk_is_enabled,
>> + .get_parent = roclk_get_parent,
>> + .set_parent = roclk_set_parent,
>> + .determine_rate = roclk_determine_rate,
>> + .recalc_rate = roclk_recalc_rate,
>> + .round_rate = roclk_round_rate,
>> + .set_rate_and_parent = roclk_set_rate_and_parent,
>> + .set_rate = roclk_set_rate,
>> + .init = roclk_init,
>> +};
> You can remove .round_rate and only use .determine_rate.
Ack. Will remove .round_rate.
> ...
>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(pic32mzda_clk, "microchip,pic32mzda-clk", pic32mzda_clock_init);
> Can you make this a platform_driver instead of using CLK_OF_DECLARE? I
> asked this in v6 but there was no response.
Mike,
I tried to use platform_driver approach, but didn't work for me.
On MIPS/PIC32 first call of clk_get() happens from "start_kernel -> time_init()->
plat_time_init()" which is very early in boot sequence even before execution of
early_initcall(). In short, by platform_driver way I'was not able to register clock(s)
before the first clock user becomes ready. Whereas with CLK_OF_DECLARE() I can
explicitly call of_clk_init() in plat_time_init() just before calling clk_get().
Please suggest me if you have any reference to avoid my case.
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists