[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CA2732.7020106@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:08:02 -0600
From: Simon Quigley <sqawesome99@...il.com>
To: Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com>, clm@...com
Cc: jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: async: fixed a brace coding style issue
On 02/21/2016 02:50 PM, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> index 5fb60ea..7914dd2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> @@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
> out:
> spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock);
>
> - if (need_change) {
> + if (need_change)
> workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active);
> - }
> +
> }
>
> static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
I thought I proposed this exact patch...hmm...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists