lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:01:07 +0100 From: Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations Is there no need of additional blank line here particulary or in all lines that I changed? -- Philippe Loctaux phil@...lippeloctaux.com On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote: > > Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings. > [] > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > [] > > @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path, > > data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end); > > } else { > > struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key; > > + > > u64 offset; > > Overzealous here. > No additional blank line required. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists