lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1456099563.31061.12.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Feb 2016 16:06:03 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Philippe Loctaux <phil@...lippeloctaux.com>
Cc:	jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations

On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:01 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> Is there no need of additional blank line here particulary
> or in all lines that I changed?

Please don't top post and just here.
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote:
> > > Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > []
> > > @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
> > >  			      data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end);
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key;
> > > +
> > >  		u64 offset;
> > 
> > Overzealous here.
> > No additional blank line required.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ