[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160222113625.GC19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:36:25 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: decompressor: several cleanups
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:31:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Masahiro Yamada (6):
> ARM: decompressor: drop unneeded assignments to "targets"
> ARM: decompressor: drop more unneeded assignments to "targets"
> ARM: decompressor: use clean-files instead of extra-y to clean files
> ARM: decompressor: drop redundant FORCE in Makefile
> ARM: decompressor: merge piggy.*.S and simplify Makefile
> ARM: decompressor: rename suffix_y to compress-y
Most of this looks fine to me, but I've a question about how thoroughly
patch 5 has been tested: iow, do we get correct behaviour if only the
compression method is changed?
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists