[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQEwm=2bHX+kTxFVJTh-sFX+3MBgwuEmmNM-XoyvdbWRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:08:05 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: decompressor: several cleanups
Hi Russell,
2016-02-22 20:36 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:31:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Masahiro Yamada (6):
>> ARM: decompressor: drop unneeded assignments to "targets"
>> ARM: decompressor: drop more unneeded assignments to "targets"
>> ARM: decompressor: use clean-files instead of extra-y to clean files
>> ARM: decompressor: drop redundant FORCE in Makefile
>> ARM: decompressor: merge piggy.*.S and simplify Makefile
>> ARM: decompressor: rename suffix_y to compress-y
>
> Most of this looks fine to me, but I've a question about how thoroughly
> patch 5 has been tested: iow, do we get correct behaviour if only the
> compression method is changed?
>
> Thanks.
I did build-test, changing the configuration
CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP -> CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA -> CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ -> ...
I confirmed zImage was created from the expected piggy.
For run-test, it worked fine too.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists