linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160222182656.2278.68402@quark.deferred.io>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:26:56 -0800
From:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To:	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"Kukjin Kim" <kgene@...nel.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Olof Johansson" <olof@...om.net>,
	"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@...nel.org>,
	"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	"Pankaj Dubey" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7

Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-02-17 02:03:36)
> On 16/02/16 07:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> > so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
> > There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
> > multi_v7 for ARMv7).
> > 
> > Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> 

Thanks for the Ack.

I've rebased patches #1 and #2 against James's b9e65ebc654d and pushed
the clk-samsung branch to the clk tree. I have deleted the
clk-samsung-kconfig branch that was blowing up the kbuild robot.
clk-samsung will not be rebased and can be used as a dependency for
arm-soc. It has been merged into clk-next.

Regards,
Mike