linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <56CBA45E.9070105@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:14:22 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on
 ARMv7

On 23.02.2016 03:26, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-02-17 02:03:36)
>> On 16/02/16 07:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
>>> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
>>> multi_v7 for ARMv7).
>>>
>>> Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
>>
> 
> Thanks for the Ack.
> 
> I've rebased patches #1 and #2 against James's b9e65ebc654d and pushed
> the clk-samsung branch to the clk tree. I have deleted the
> clk-samsung-kconfig branch that was blowing up the kbuild robot.
> clk-samsung will not be rebased and can be used as a dependency for
> arm-soc. It has been merged into clk-next.

Thanks, pulled!

Best regards,
Krzysztof