[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CB67C6.3050707@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:50 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/xsaves: Fix init_fpstate.header.xcomp_bv
On 02/22/2016 10:59 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> This actually does not apply to XSAVES as XSAVES uses optimization. After
> init, all components are in INIT and not MODIFIED state and will not be
> saved. There is no need of setting xcomp_bv except for bit 63 to indicate
> a compacted format.
I look at it this way: xcomp_bv tells you the format of the buffer
xstate_bv tells you which components of the buffer are valid (not in
init state).
As it stands, every kernel xcomp_bv value should be identical, since the
kernel buffer is always in the same state and XSAVES is always called
with the same Requested Feature BitMap (RFBM).
While I don't think this patch _hurts_ anything, I think it might be a
bit confusing. Wouldn't it just be easier if *EVERY* xcomp_bv value was
the same?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists