[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CB68C2.6010003@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:00:02 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] x86/xsaves: Fix PTRACE frames for XSAVES
On 02/22/2016 11:00 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> + if (xsave->header.xfeatures & XFEATURE_MASK_SUPERVISOR)
> + xsave->header.xfeatures = xfeatures | XFEATURE_MASK_SUPERVISOR;
> + else
> + xsave->header.xfeatures = xfeatures;
This is dangerous. It says, "if any supervisor feature bit is set, then
set *ALL* of the known bits". There's no way that can work.
Don't you just want to or in the new bits that were in the passed-in
'xfeatures':
xsave->header.xfeatures |= xfeatures;
'xfeatures' is known not to contain any supervisor bits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists