[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CDF056.8020408@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:03:02 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: Add workaround for Cavium erratum 27456
On 02/24/2016 06:07 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 24/02/16 13:40, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> (and Catalin, if you pick this up, watch out for the conflicts in
>> cpufeature.h)
>
> Yup, that one is about to become a minefield (ARM64_HAS_NO_HW_PREFETCH,
> ARM64_HAS_UAO, ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO and ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN are
> already happily clashing into -next). But hey, the more the merrier! ;-)
>
Would you like me to rebase it to for-next/core ?
David.
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists