linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] random kernel crashes after THP rework on s390 (maybe also on PowerPC and ARM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56CD8302.9080202@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:16:34 +0100
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] random kernel crashes after THP rework on s390 (maybe also
 on PowerPC and ARM)

On 02/23/2016 09:22 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:33:45PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 07:19:07PM +0100, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
>>> I'll check with Martin, maybe it is actually trivial, then we can
>>> do a quick test it to rule that one out.
>>
>> Oh. I found a bug in __split_huge_pmd_locked(). Although, not sure if it's
>> _the_ bug.
>>
>> pmdp_invalidate() is called for the wrong address :-/
>> I guess that can be destructive on the architecture, right?
> 
> FWIW, arm64 ignores the address parameter for set_pmd_at, so this would
> only result in the TLBI nuking the wrong entries, which is going to be
> tricky to observe in practice given that we install a table entry
> immediately afterwards that maps the same pages. If s390 does more here
> (I see some magic asm using the address), that could be the answer...

This patch does not change the address for set_pmd_at, it does that for the 
pmdp_invalidate here (by keeping haddr at the start of the pmd)

--->    pmdp_invalidate(vma, haddr, pmd);
        pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
 



Without that fix we would clearly have stale tlb entries, no?