lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:16:19 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	riel@...hat.com
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	luto@...capital.net, peterz@...radead.org, clark@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v6] sched,time: reduce nohz_full syscall overhead
 40%

On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, riel@...hat.com wrote:

> (v6: make VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN jiffy granularity)
> 
> Running with nohz_full introduces a fair amount of overhead.
> Specifically, various things that are usually done from the
> timer interrupt are now done at syscall, irq, and guest
> entry and exit times.
> 
> However, some of the code that is called every single time
> has only ever worked at jiffy resolution. The code in
> __acct_update_integrals was also doing some unnecessary
> calculations.
> 
> Getting rid of the unnecessary calculations, without
> changing any of the functionality in __acct_update_integrals
> gets us about an 11% win.
> 
> Not calling the time statistics updating code more than
> once per jiffy, like is done on housekeeping CPUs and on
> all the CPUs of a non-nohz_full system, shaves off a
> further 30%.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ