[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CECBD7.1020101@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:39:35 +0200
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
<arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: davinci: dm365: Add dma_slave_map to edma
On 02/22/2016 11:58 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 06:13 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Provide the dma_slave_map to edma which will allow us to move the drivers
>> to the new, simpler dmaengine API and we can remove the DMA resources also
>> for the devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>
>> FIX: dm365
>
> dropped this "note to self" :)
Oh, yes, thanks. I needed to fix up things while addressing the core support
comments and the struct changed on the way several times.
Sorry about it.
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
>> index 01843fbcc9ea..d26dc2b4339a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_data/edma.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h>
>> @@ -862,9 +863,30 @@ static s8 dm365_queue_priority_mapping[][2] = {
>> {-1, -1},
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct dma_slave_map da365_edma_map[] = {
>
> This should be "dm365_edma_map".
>
> Fixed both locally while applying.
>
> Regards,
> Sekhar
>
--
Péter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists