[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225122035.GB10593@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:20:35 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: generic: add description of property
"interrupt-skip-mask"
Hi,
In future, please send the binding document first in a series, per point
3 of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt. It makes
review easier/faster.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:53:28PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Interrupt Pin register is read-only and optional. Some pci devices may use
> msi/msix but leave the value of Interrupt Pin non-zero.
Is that permitted by the spec? Surely 'optional' means it must be zero
if not implemented?
> In this case, the driver will print information as below: pci
> 0000:40:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=-22
>
> It's easily lead to misinterpret.
If this is limited to a subset of devices which we know are broken in
this regard, can we not handle these cases explicitly?
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt
> index 3f1d3fc..0f10978 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt
> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ Practice: Interrupt Mapping' and requires the following properties:
>
> - interrupt-map-mask : <see aforementioned specification>
>
> +- interrupt-skip-mask: Explicitly declare which pci devices only use msi/msix
> +but leave the value of Interrupt Pin non-zero.
Unlike the rest of the interrupt mapping properties, this is not
described in `Open Firmware Recommended Practice: Interrupt Mapping'.
This needs a far more complete description.
This also doesn't strike me as th right approach. The interrupt-map-mask
property describe as relationship between the host-controller-provided
interrupt lines and endpoints, while this seems to be a bug completely
contained within an endpoint.
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> Example:
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists