linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/54] 3.10.98-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160225163329.GA20839@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:33:35 +0000
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	<patches@...nelci.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/54] 3.10.98-stable review

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:57:05PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 07:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.98 release.
> >There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Fri Feb 26 03:33:35 UTC 2016.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 122 pass: 120 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
> 	mn10300:asb2303_defconfig
> 	mn10300:asb2364_defconfig
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0
> 
> The build error is:
> 
> fs/aio.c: In function 'aio_setup_single_vector':
> fs/aio.c:982:12: error: 'PAGE_CACHE_MASK' undeclared
> 
> This is caused by 'AIO: properly check iovec sizes'.

Oh that's just crazy...

And, an attempt to include <linux/pagemap.h> results in an include loop
preventing that from working properly.

Ugh, how about I just leave this as-is until someone for that arch
actually cares enough to fix it up?  Playing include-file-whack-a-mole
is not a fun thing to do...

thanks,

greg k-h