linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/54] 3.10.98-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56CF337E.5060300@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:01:50 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/54] 3.10.98-stable review

On 02/25/2016 08:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:57:05PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 02/23/2016 07:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.98 release.
>>> There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri Feb 26 03:33:35 UTC 2016.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 122 pass: 120 fail: 2
>> Failed builds:
>> 	mn10300:asb2303_defconfig
>> 	mn10300:asb2364_defconfig
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0
>>
>> The build error is:
>>
>> fs/aio.c: In function 'aio_setup_single_vector':
>> fs/aio.c:982:12: error: 'PAGE_CACHE_MASK' undeclared
>>
>> This is caused by 'AIO: properly check iovec sizes'.
>
> Oh that's just crazy...
>
> And, an attempt to include <linux/pagemap.h> results in an include loop
> preventing that from working properly.
>
> Ugh, how about I just leave this as-is until someone for that arch
> actually cares enough to fix it up?  Playing include-file-whack-a-mole
> is not a fun thing to do...
>
Sure, fine with me.

Guenter