lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGhQ9VykdYLA-ey2pzDVtccLPZvHNYLzmLHKyOnKr2TLLV+2yA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:32:55 +0100
From:	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
To:	Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at
 correct place

Hi Colin,

On 24 February 2016 at 18:32, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The initialization of ngroups is occurring at the end of the
> first iteration of the outer loop, which means that the
> assignment  pins[ngroups++] = i is potentially indexing into
> a region outside of array pins because ngroups is not initialized.
> Instead, initialize ngroups in the inner loop before the first
> inner loop iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> index f0bebbe..ed1cfa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> @@ -1170,9 +1170,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_create_group_func_map(struct device *dev,
>         u16 pins[ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins)];
>         int func, ngroups, i;
>
> -       for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; ngroups = 0, func++) {
> -
> -               for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {
> +       for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; func++) {
> +               for (ngroups = 0, i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {

Good catch!

Reviewed-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>


regards,
Joachim Eastwood

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ