[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGhQ9VykdYLA-ey2pzDVtccLPZvHNYLzmLHKyOnKr2TLLV+2yA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:32:55 +0100
From: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at
correct place
Hi Colin,
On 24 February 2016 at 18:32, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The initialization of ngroups is occurring at the end of the
> first iteration of the outer loop, which means that the
> assignment pins[ngroups++] = i is potentially indexing into
> a region outside of array pins because ngroups is not initialized.
> Instead, initialize ngroups in the inner loop before the first
> inner loop iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> index f0bebbe..ed1cfa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> @@ -1170,9 +1170,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_create_group_func_map(struct device *dev,
> u16 pins[ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins)];
> int func, ngroups, i;
>
> - for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; ngroups = 0, func++) {
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {
> + for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; func++) {
> + for (ngroups = 0, i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
regards,
Joachim Eastwood
Powered by blists - more mailing lists