linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160226133350.911293e1582f07134febdf48@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:33:50 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:10:06 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 02/25/2016 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Fixes: cd0ea35ff551 ("signals, pkeys: Notify userspace about protection key faults")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> >  arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 +-
> >  arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 +-
> >  include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h   | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> > index 0151cfab929d..0c660bbccd3f 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
> >  					void __user *_upper;
> >  				} _addr_bnd;
> >  				/* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
> > -				u64 _pkey;
> > +				int _pkey;
> >  			};
> >  		} _sigfault;
> 
> Considering Peter's feedback on my 'unsigned long' approach, I'm fine
> with your patch, Stephen.  Can it just be picked up in to the tip tree?
> 
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

I've moved add-compile-time-check-for-__arch_si_preamble_size.patch to
be after linux-next and have added this patch (as
add-compile-time-check-for-__arch_si_preamble_size-fix.patch) to be
folded into add-compile-time-check-for-__arch_si_preamble_size.patch
later on.

So no -tip changes should be needed.