[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D0B11E.2050402@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:10:06 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
On 02/25/2016 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Fixes: cd0ea35ff551 ("signals, pkeys: Notify userspace about protection key faults")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 +-
> include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> index 0151cfab929d..0c660bbccd3f 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
> void __user *_upper;
> } _addr_bnd;
> /* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
> - u64 _pkey;
> + int _pkey;
> };
> } _sigfault;
Considering Peter's feedback on my 'unsigned long' approach, I'm fine
with your patch, Stephen. Can it just be picked up in to the tip tree?
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists