[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fuwg9bog.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:24:15 +0100
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
To: Pankaj Dev <pankaj.dev@...com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mturquette@...aro.org, kernel@...inux.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
laurent.meunier@...com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
maxime.coquelin@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] clk: Add debugfs nodes for enable/disable/set-rate/set-parent
Pankaj Dev <pankaj.dev@...com> writes:
> 1. clk_set_rate : Set new rate to value. Reading returns the
> current rate
If you can use this to set *and* read it, then "_set_" shouldn't be in
the name.
What is wrong with using the existing "clk_rate" for reading/setting the
rate?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists