[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87twkvj2yi.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:22:29 +0100
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
To: Pankaj DEV <pankaj.dev@...com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"mturquette\@linaro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"kernel\@stlinux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
"sboyd\@codeaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Laurent MEUNIER <laurent.meunier@...com>,
"lee.jones\@linaro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] clk: Add debugfs nodes for enable/disable/set-rate/set-parent
Pankaj DEV <pankaj.dev@...com> writes:
> The prime motive for clk_set_rate is to set new rate for a clock,
> since the 'clk_rate' currently available, allows only reading.
> To provide reading rate from 'clk_set_rate' is just additional feature.
Sure.
But my point is to combine things.
After your patch:
- read via clk_rate
- read via clk_set_rate
- write via clk_set_rate
My proposal:
- read via clk_rate
- write via clk_rate
Powered by blists - more mailing lists