[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160229154231.5e6f0804@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:42:31 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
between commit:
7791e4aa59ad ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable HWP by default")
from the pm tree and commit:
bc696ca05f5a ("x86/cpufeature: Replace the old static_cpu_has() with safe variant")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter)
and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists