[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D55506.4050007@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:38:30 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"Olof Johansson" <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
Le 01/03/2016 05:00, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:57:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> drivers/clk/at91/clk-main.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 99a81706526f ("clk: at91: remove IRQ handling and use polling")
>>
>> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>>
>> 8c1b1e54faed ("clk: at91: Remove impossible checks for of_clk_get_parent_count()")
>>
>> from the clk tree.
>
> And the same for drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c
Stephen,
Both fixes seem good. Thanks!
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists