[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160301150054.2cb0e728@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:00:54 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:57:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-main.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 99a81706526f ("clk: at91: remove IRQ handling and use polling")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> 8c1b1e54faed ("clk: at91: Remove impossible checks for of_clk_get_parent_count()")
>
> from the clk tree.
And the same for drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c
index 7d4a1864ea7c,016fe110b5ba..000000000000
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-master.c
@@@ -199,14 -221,14 +199,14 @@@ of_at91_clk_master_setup(struct device_
const struct clk_master_layout *layout)
{
struct clk *clk;
- int num_parents;
+ unsigned int num_parents;
- unsigned int irq;
const char *parent_names[MASTER_SOURCE_MAX];
const char *name = np->name;
struct clk_master_characteristics *characteristics;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(np);
- if (num_parents <= 0 || num_parents > MASTER_SOURCE_MAX)
+ if (num_parents == 0 || num_parents > MASTER_SOURCE_MAX)
return;
of_clk_parent_fill(np, parent_names, num_parents);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists