[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37E44D6E1@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:03:07 +0000
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"elliott@....com" <elliott@....com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure to
comply ACPI 6.1
We have a bunch of macros in include/acmacros.h -- like this:
ACPI_MOVE_16_TO_16(d, s)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toshi Kani [mailto:toshi.kani@....com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:38 AM
> To: Moore, Robert; rjw@...ysocki.net; Williams, Dan J
> Cc: Zheng, Lv; elliott@....com; linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org; linux-
> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...ica.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure to
> comply ACPI 6.1
>
> On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 15:13 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Toshi Kani [mailto:toshi.kani@....com]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 1:55 PM
> > > To: rjw@...ysocki.net; Williams, Dan J
> > > Cc: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; elliott@....com;
> > > linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.or g; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org;
> > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...ica.org; Toshi Kani
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure
> > > to comply ACPI 6.1
> > >
> > > ACPI 6.1, Table 5-133, updates NVDIMM Control Region Structure as
> > > follows.
> > > - Valid Fields, Manufacturing Location, and Manufacturing Date
> > > are added from reserved range. No change in the structure size.
> > > - IDs defined as SPD values are arrays of bytes. The spec
> > > clarified that they need to be represented as arrays of bytes
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > This patch makes the following changes to support this update.
> > > - Change 'struct acpi_nfit_control_region' to reflect the update.
> > > SPD IDs are defined as arrays of bytes, so that they can be
> > > treated in the same way regardless of CPU endianness and are
> > > not miss-treated as little-endian numeric values.
> >
> >
> > I don't think we are going to start changing the ACPI tables defined
> > in the ACPICA headers because of this. We do in fact have macros for
> > this purpose.
>
> Can you elaborate what macros you suggest to use for this purpose?
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists