linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] ARM64: Enable Amlogic Meson GXBaby platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56D5BE4D.7090107@arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:07:41 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	linux-meson@...glegroups.com, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Nicolas Saenz <nicolassaenzj@...il.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ARM64: Enable Amlogic Meson GXBaby platform



On 01/03/16 15:26, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 01.03.2016 um 15:43 schrieb Sudeep Holla:
>> On 29/02/16 23:44, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Provide the ARCH_MESON Kconfig symbol to allow enabling existing serial
>>> and i2c drivers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 6 ++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> index a0a69589e46c..17d0ddaa0516 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ config ARCH_MEDIATEK
>>>        help
>>>          Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoCs
>>>
>>> +config ARCH_MESON
>>> +    bool "Amlogic Platforms"
>>> +    select ARM_GIC
>>
>> Why do you need this ? CONFIG_ARM64 selects GIC for you.
>
> ARCH_MEDIATEK above does and should be fixed too then.

Yes I did see that when I checked before replying to you and assumed you
might have taken it as reference as it's just above this entry :)

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep