[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4015342.1TJkp5X8uB@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:28:54 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: NSP: Add PWM Support to DT
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 20:22:01 Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 12:42:49 Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
> >> };
> >>
> >> + pwm: pwm@...00 {
> >> + compatible = "brcm,iproc-pwm";
> >> + reg = <0x31000 0x28>;
> >> + clocks = <&osc>;
> >> + #pwm-cells = >;
> >> + status = "disabled";
> >> + };
> >>
> >
> > Should this also list "brcm,kona-pwm" as compatible? From patch
> > 1, it sounds like that was the original one.
>
> Arnd,
>
> The NSP is a iProc based SoC and the pwm controller register offsets are
> slightly differ with the kona pwm controller. The compatible will be either
> "brcm,kona-pwm" or "brcm,iproc-pwm".
Ok, got it, thanks for the explanation.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists