[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL2FKYkoXFm_pG6inxJqwkRqEK-TsMT2ndy4fgvQG1wT6AZ03Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:22:01 +0530
From: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: NSP: Add PWM Support to DT
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 March 2016 12:42:49 Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
>> };
>>
>> + pwm: pwm@...00 {
>> + compatible = "brcm,iproc-pwm";
>> + reg = <0x31000 0x28>;
>> + clocks = <&osc>;
>> + #pwm-cells = >;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>>
>
> Should this also list "brcm,kona-pwm" as compatible? From patch
> 1, it sounds like that was the original one.
Arnd,
The NSP is a iProc based SoC and the pwm controller register offsets are
slightly differ with the kona pwm controller. The compatible will be either
"brcm,kona-pwm" or "brcm,iproc-pwm".
>
> Arnd
Regards
Dhananjay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists