[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D70CE2.1050500@nextfour.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:55:14 +0200
From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack
On 02.03.2016 13:20, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> 04633df0c43d ("x86/cpu: Call verify_cpu() after having entered long mode too")
> added the call to verify_cpu() for sanitizing CPU configuration.
>
> The latter uses the stack minimally and it can happen that we land in
> startup_64() directly from a 64-bit bootloader. Then we want to use our
> own, known good stack.
>
> Do that.
>
> APs don't need this as the trampoline sets up a stack for them.
>
> Reported-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> index 22fbf9df61bb..d60a044c2fdc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ startup_64:
> * tables and then reload them.
> */
>
> + /* Setup a stack for verify_cpu */
> + movq stack_start - __START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> + subq $__START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> +
You subtract __START_KERNEL_map twice ?
--Mika
Powered by blists - more mailing lists