[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302161532.GK16954@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:15:32 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:55:14PM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> > + /* Setup a stack for verify_cpu */
> > + movq stack_start - __START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> > + subq $__START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> > +
>
> You subtract __START_KERNEL_map twice ?
Yes. That's not very obvious and it took me a while. I probably should
add a comment.
Want to stare at it a little bit more and try to figure it out or should
I explain?
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists