lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302161532.GK16954@pd.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:15:32 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:55:14PM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> > +	/* Setup a stack for verify_cpu */
> > +	movq    stack_start - __START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> > +	subq	$__START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> > +
>
> You subtract __START_KERNEL_map twice ?

Yes. That's not very obvious and it took me a while. I probably should
add a comment.

Want to stare at it a little bit more and try to figure it out or should
I explain?

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ