[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1456958018-7849-5-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 23:33:35 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid division by 0
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
The clk API may return 0 on clk_get_rate, so we should check the result before
using it as a divisor.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
Should go individually via subsystem tree.
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
index 9163085101bc94..6487962c355c03 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(lpc18xx_pwm->pwm_clk);
+ if (!lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate)
+ return -EINVAL;
mutex_init(&lpc18xx_pwm->res_lock);
mutex_init(&lpc18xx_pwm->period_lock);
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists