[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302224047.GN8362@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 23:40:47 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:32:54PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I'm trying to think of any reason why we couldn't simply have a symbol
> at the top of the initial stack? Then a simple leaq would suffice;
> this is for the BSP after all.
That should be simpler. And we do games like that already in the trampoline:
# Setup stack
movl $rm_stack_end, %esp
...
GLOBAL(rm_stack)
.space 2048
GLOBAL(rm_stack_end)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists