[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302132024.GO18327@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:20:24 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: remove unused variable
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:27:09PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> > My From: is Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...ill.com>
> > and my Signed-off-by: is Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
> > My From name and Signed-off name matches. But my emails donot match.
> Which is fine - unless you are submitting patches to Mark 8). I also
> usually split my email address and GregKH doesn't seem to mind at all.
I usually end up applying but I don't like having to think about it and
normally only for people I recognise both addresses and all the names
for - there's a lot of places that can fall over. I've noticed an
increase in the number of people missing out signoffs recently for some
reason so anything that looks like a non-author message is a red flag.
> The other option I suppose would be to put both addresses in the signed
> off by sequence, but that probably causes confusion
The other option is to just not use the work address if you don't want
to use it (that's what I do).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists