linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: remove unused variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:42:52 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: remove unused variable

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:37:50PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:27:09PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:

> > The other option I suppose would be to put both addresses in the signed
> > off by sequence, but that probably causes confusion

> yes, maybe. I believe I should be responsible for the patches which I
> have sent and any regression or problem because of any of my patch
> should come to me. If I just use my corporate email address in both my
> From: and Signed-off: then I will not be reachable after I change job.

People will probably figure it out if you're still around, it's not like
you'd be the only person to ever change address.  Or just do one of the
other things.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)