[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160302135323.1213f578@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:53:23 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: remove unused variable
> > The other option I suppose would be to put both addresses in the signed
> > off by sequence, but that probably causes confusion
>
> The other option is to just not use the work address if you don't want
> to use it (that's what I do).
That assumes your work email system can handle kernel traffic and doesn't
inflict things like Microsoft Outlook or mash up the content or add bogus
footers.
There are plenty of people who really don't want to be using their work
email for the kernel 8)
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists