[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:12:20 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Cc: vinholikatti@...il.com, julian.calaby@...il.com,
akinobu.mita@...il.com, hch@...radead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
robh@...nel.org, gbroner@...eaurora.org, subhashj@...eaurora.org,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] add support for DWC UFS Host Controller
On Thursday 03 March 2016 13:52:39 Joao Pinto wrote:
>
> config SCSI_UFS_DWC
> bool
>
> config SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PLATFORM
> tristate "DesignWare platform support using a G210 Test Chip"
> depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM
> select SCSI_UFS_DWC
> ---help---
> Synopsys Test Chip is a PHY for prototyping purposes.
>
> If unsure, say N."
>
> config SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PCI
> tristate "DesignWare pci support using a G210 Test Chip"
> depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI
> select SCSI_UFS_DWC
> ---help---
> Synopsys Test Chip is a PHY for prototyping purposes.
>
> If unsure, say N."
>
> I would keep SCSI_UFS_DWC to avoid building DWC specific source everytime.
>
> Agree?
>
Yes, looks good to me.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists