[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:17:28 +0000
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC: <vinholikatti@...il.com>, <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
<akinobu.mita@...il.com>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<gbroner@...eaurora.org>, <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
<CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] add support for DWC UFS Host Controller
On 3/3/2016 2:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2016 13:52:39 Joao Pinto wrote:
>>
>> config SCSI_UFS_DWC
>> bool
>>
>> config SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PLATFORM
>> tristate "DesignWare platform support using a G210 Test Chip"
>> depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM
>> select SCSI_UFS_DWC
>> ---help---
>> Synopsys Test Chip is a PHY for prototyping purposes.
>>
>> If unsure, say N."
>>
>> config SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PCI
>> tristate "DesignWare pci support using a G210 Test Chip"
>> depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI
>> select SCSI_UFS_DWC
>> ---help---
>> Synopsys Test Chip is a PHY for prototyping purposes.
>>
>> If unsure, say N."
>>
>> I would keep SCSI_UFS_DWC to avoid building DWC specific source everytime.
>>
>> Agree?
>>
>
> Yes, looks good to me.
>
> Arnd
>
Nice! Thanks for the inputs. I'm going to implement the changes and send a v10 soon.
Joao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists