[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160304203018.GC5530@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:30:18 -0500
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: +
x86-add-support-for-pud-sized-transparent-hugepages-checkpatch-fixes.patch
added to -mm tree
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:48:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > @@ -111,8 +111,10 @@ static inline pud_t native_pudp_get_and_
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > return native_make_pud(xchg(&pudp->pud, 0));
> > #else
> > - /* native_local_pudp_get_and_clear,
> > - but duplicated because of cyclic dependency */
> > + /*
> > + * native_local_pudp_get_and_clear, but duplicated because of cyclic
> > + * dependency
> > + */
> > pud_t ret = *pudp;
> > native_pud_clear(pudp);
> > return ret;
>
> When referring to functions in comments (or changelogs) please use () to make it
> clear on sight what is being referred to.
>
> Also, please try to construct proper English sentences with verbs and such!
>
> I.e. something like this would work for me:
>
> > + /*
> > + * This is a duplicate of native_local_pudp_get_and_clear(),
> > + * because we cannot use the original due to a cyclic header
> > + * file dependency:
> > + */
>
> (Assuming I managed to decode the shorthand form properly.)
I have no idea what it means. This is copy-and-change of the pmd version,
which was originally commit db3eb96f4e6281b84dd33c8980dacc27f2efe177 by
Andrea.
It seems unfair to ask me to do better than what is there right now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists