[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160305085059.GA23473@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 09:50:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: remove dl_new from sched_dl_entity
* Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 57b939c..e0c4456 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,14 @@ static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
> struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
> struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
>
> - WARN_ON(!dl_se->dl_new || dl_se->dl_throttled);
> + WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
> +
> + /* We are racing with the deadline timer. So, do nothing because
> + the deadline timer handler will take care of properly recharging
> + the runtime and postponing the deadline
> + */
> + if(dl_se->dl_throttled)
> + return;
Obligatory:
Please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:
/*
* Comment .....
* ...... goes here.
*/
... specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
> static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> + if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq_clock(rq))) {
> + setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl);
> + }
Obligatory:
Please don't use curly braces around single statements.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists