[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160306135430.GA17315@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 05:54:30 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
> >> patch [4/8].
> >>
> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
> >> review yet.
> >
> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
>
> Great, thank you!
>
> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
> sent v5 in order to correct this.
>
> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.
What do the fixup patches look like? That might be easier to take if
they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which
isn't a big deal...)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists