[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DC3BAD.8020107@rock-chips.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:16:13 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
jh80.chung@...sung.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, shawn.lin@...nel-upstream.org,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: add resets support to dw_mmc
On 2016/3/6 16:47, Guodong Xu wrote:
> mmc registers may in abnormal state if mmc is used in bootloader,
> eg. to support booting from eMMC. So we need reset mmc registers
> when kernel boots up, instead of assuming mmc is in clean state.
>
> With this patch, user can add a 'resets' property into dw_mmc dts
> node. When driver parse_dt and probe, it calls reset API to
> deassert the 'reset' of dw_mmc host controller. When probe error or
> remove, it calls reset API to assert it.
>
> Please also refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Really should V2 and add the changelog.
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 242f9a0..281ea9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -2878,6 +2878,14 @@ static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
> if (!pdata)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> + /* find reset controller when exist */
> + pdata->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->rstc)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(pdata->rstc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + pdata->rstc = NULL;
maybe we can remove "pdata->rstc = NULL", and directly
use IS_ERR(..) for the following "if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)"
statement
> + }
> +
> /* find out number of slots supported */
> of_property_read_u32(np, "num-slots", &pdata->num_slots);
>
> @@ -2949,7 +2957,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>
> if (!host->pdata) {
> host->pdata = dw_mci_parse_dt(host);
> - if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(host->pdata) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
please fix the coding style here.
> + else if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
> dev_err(host->dev, "platform data not available\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -3012,6 +3022,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
> }
> }
>
> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
> + reset_control_deassert(host->pdata->rstc);
> +
sorry, I can't follow your intention here. Shouldn't it be something
like "assert mmc -> may need delay -> deassert mmc". As your current
code, nothing happend right?
> setup_timer(&host->cmd11_timer,
> dw_mci_cmd11_timer, (unsigned long)host);
>
> @@ -3164,6 +3177,9 @@ err_dmaunmap:
> if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
> host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>
> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
> + reset_control_assert(host->pdata->rstc);
> +
> err_clk_ciu:
> if (!IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk);
> @@ -3196,11 +3212,15 @@ void dw_mci_remove(struct dw_mci *host)
> if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
> host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>
> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
> + reset_control_assert(host->pdata->rstc);
> +
> if (!IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk);
>
> if (!IS_ERR(host->biu_clk))
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->biu_clk);
> +
> }
unnecessary new line here.
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_mci_remove);
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists