lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160306184325.GA12092@krava>
Date:	Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:43:25 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] perf tools: Introduce
 perf_hpp__setup_hists_formats()

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:59:36PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

>  
> @@ -2133,8 +2134,19 @@ static void hists__delete_all_entries(struct hists *hists)
>  static void hists_evsel__exit(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
>  {
>  	struct hists *hists = evsel__hists(evsel);
> +	struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt, *pos;
> +	struct perf_hpp_list_node *node;
>  
>  	hists__delete_all_entries(hists);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(node, &hists->hpp_formats, list) {
> +		perf_hpp_list__for_each_format_safe(&node->hpp, fmt, pos) {
> +			list_del(&fmt->list);
> +			free(fmt);
> +		}
> +		list_del(&node->list);
> +		free(node);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int hists_evsel__init(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> index f4ef513527ba..3cab9dc20822 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct hists {
>  	u16			col_len[HISTC_NR_COLS];
>  	int			socket_filter;
>  	struct perf_hpp_list	*hpp_list;
> +	struct list_head	hpp_formats;

I've been thinking.. should hpp_formats and hpp_list be merged? something like:

struct perf_hpp_list {
	struct list_head nodes;
	int levels;
}

sturct perf_hpp_list_node {
	int level;
	struct list_head fields;
	struct list_head sorts;
	int nr_sort_keys;
};

it seems wrong to me that your hierarchy code and current one
got in separate paths.. we could have the new hierarchy support
struct above being used in current non-hierarchy code just
by using single level

I haven't thought all this through.. just an idea ;-)

thanks,
jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ